I've been wanting to read Forgotten for awhile. The idea of a girl whose memory reset every night so that she had no recollection of the past, yet could see the future, sounded kinda
The good news is this book features no love triangles. The bad news is it features a helluva lot of insta-love. You see, London (our protagonist) meets a guy she has no future memory of, and falls in love with him on the spot. But because she can't see him in her future, she figures there's no point in wasting time, so she leaves him out of the notes she writes for herself every night so that she can "remember" the past. The next time she sees him it's like the first time for her - and bang! Insta-love again. Eventually she starts to write him into her notes, but that just makes things worse - it makes her all excited to see this guy she doesn't actually know (having zero memories of him), and then when she does KABOOM! Insta-love AGAIN. And again and again and again. And it's not just your run-of-the-mill "he's the one" insta-love, either. It's the lip-biting, breath-taking, swoon-worthy kind of insta-love, where she has to notice how gorgeous his eyes/jawline/hair/abs/toenails are every freaking time he appears on the page. It's all so tedious.
What I did like about Forgotten was the mystery. London "remembers" a funeral, and as she tries to figure out whose is it, her past begins to unravel and the real reason behind her memory issue comes to light. Too bad this mystery takes a back seat whenever her boyfriend is around. I'm parapharsing, but legit something along these lines happens in the book: "OMG someone I love is going to DIE! Oh hey Luke, you've got nice pecs, let's make out".
London's relationship with her friend Jamie also frustrated the hell out of me. London can see some terrible stuff in her bestie's future, but she does very little to try and stop it. I understand the idea that she doesn't want to interefere too much in others' lives, but for the most part it seemed like actually, she was just more interested in her own love life than anyone else.
Cat Patrick has a smooth writing style, but unfortunately Forgotten is full of plot holes and unbelievable twists. I know with any story - but especially one like this - you have to be able to suspend your disbelief, and I can do that to a certain extent, but it still has to be logical within the world that's built. There were a few things that I just couldn't swallow. I was really disappointed with Forgotten on the whole. I do still really love the cover, though (hey, I wanted to end on a positive note!).
Rating: 2.5/5
Spoilery Talking Points
- How does nobody know about London's condition except her mum and her best friend? How does she even go to school - wouldn't she be better off home schooled? And as if her mum would've - or should have - let her go to summer camp when she was younger with a condition like hers! Little, illogical details like this drove me nuts.
- One big illogical detail really made me mad, though - the whole "whoops, we buried the wrong body" thing with her little brother. No, just no. What kind of authorities would be like, "we found some bones, your son is missing, so it MUST be him, we don't have to run tests or anything, oh no." Right.
I pictured Lily Collins as London and Sean Faris (circa Life As We Know It) as Luke. Coz they're pretty like the characters.
Source |
Source |
Published: 2011, Hardie Grant
Get It: Bookworld
Yikes. This book sounds like one of the ones I'd toss across the room as well. Seriously, what is with the freaking insta-love?! I'm so tired of it. And I totally agree, there has to be some degree of believability to a story regardless of how unbelievable some of its circumstances are. Bummer it didn't quite pan out.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I think I was more annoyed because I've been wanting to read it for so long! Oh well, can't love 'em all :)
DeleteLoved your review!:)I've had my eye on this book for a long time because it sounded great, but after reading your review I'm so glad I didn't buy it! Maybe my library will get it one day.
ReplyDeleteAlice @ Alice in Readerland
Thanks Alice! Yes, get it from the library - it's not terrible, but it's just not great.
DeleteWell, insta-love in this case makes sense or she'd never fall in love. ;) However, not happy about the plot holes and bad twists to add to that. Hm... think I'll pass, but might try the author's other books.
ReplyDeleteGood point :) Yes, maybe if that was the only problem it wouldn't have seemed so bad.
DeleteI loved the concept of this one, but pulling off something like this is a pretty tough ask. I managed to suspend disbelief for the most part, but really struggled with the ending. And, yes, the insta-love element is actually incredibly eerie.
ReplyDeleteI didn't mind her second one, but if you do read it, I recommend reading it alongside Megan Miranda's Fracture, as they're quite similar in concept. :)
I could suspend disbelief on the concept itself, but not the way the characters acted within that, if that makes sense.
DeleteEerie is a good way of putting it - basically, she had no way of knowing anything about that relationship except for what he told her. It's worrying - lucky he was a nice character.
Thanks for the tip - I have Fracture, so I might check it out alongside Patrick's next book.
I started reading this before it even came out but only got a chapter in. I meant to pick it up again, but it still sits there catching dust!
ReplyDeleteSo it was... Forgotten?
DeleteSorry, I had to go there, lol. But yes it's not really a page-turner or must-read.